The verdict
For a task like this, the model doesn't matter.
This ran expecting a leaderboard — a best, a worst, at least one model that fumbled the math. That's not what happened. Four separate codebases independently implemented the same partial sum and converged on the same approximation error, within a rounding error of each other. The precise claim: What's left to optimize is cost, speed, and taste — and one of those diverged by roughly 200×.
The race, on video
four terminals, one screen, real timeThe wall-clock times in the post feed the Speed & temperament measurement. The video plays on X — this site makes no external requests.
The contestants
exact model IDs, dug out of each CLI's session storeThe scoreboard
every measurement, one table| Model | Ran through | MSE | Lines | Size | Cost |
|---|
MSE = mean-squared error of the traced wave vs an ideal square wave, read off each app's own live readout. Four different authors, one rounding error apart.