Test 01 · ran 2026-07-09

One prompt. Four models.
No winner.

Run all four, live Take the blind test

The verdict

For a task like this, the model doesn't matter.

This ran expecting a leaderboard — a best, a worst, at least one model that fumbled the math. That's not what happened. Four separate codebases independently implemented the same partial sum and converged on the same approximation error, within a rounding error of each other. The precise claim: What's left to optimize is cost, speed, and taste — and one of those diverged by roughly 200×.

The race, on video

four terminals, one screen, real time

The wall-clock times in the post feed the Speed & temperament measurement. The video plays on X — this site makes no external requests.

The contestants

exact model IDs, dug out of each CLI's session store

The scoreboard

every measurement, one table
ModelRan throughMSELinesSizeCost

MSE = mean-squared error of the traced wave vs an ideal square wave, read off each app's own live readout. Four different authors, one rounding error apart.

The measurements

each one gets its own deep dive